Re: astral sex & real sex?
I like that from Leland. I don't know about 'utilitarian', but that's not really what's on my mind. I can't say I can remember ever having actually 'done it' astrally - that physical feature of sex, insertion, so pales in comparison to the ecstasy of contact and synergism that perhaps I feel it would be anticlimactic. I’m sure I’m in the minority on this, if not the only guy in the world who hasn’t literally &**ked in a dream. It’s not the sort of thing I share with my buddies. There may be a reason for it, though.
Mr. Leland alludes to what I hope to be able to elaborate,
The experience of two minds merging in nonphysical reality has an ecstatic dimension.
When we consider that at all times we are possessed of a number of energy bodies, we might wonder if there is a scale of some sort reflecting an individual’s strong or weak association or psychological identification with a particular energy body. Goodness, more simply, might ‘sensitives’ identify with their astral bodies to a greater extent than others who favor the physical body?
Let’s just presume the answer is ‘yes’. What I am suggesting (and only from my personal experience) is that the experience of sex physically and astrally might carry different weights with different sorts of people. ‘Love’, ‘attraction’ - ‘desire’ might have a little different formula for me than some others. I’m thinking that when sex is highly charged in the astral/emotional body that it may have potent effects on the physical.
Hmmm. Dang-it, I’m gonna’ have to cut to the chase. Banally put, as an artist/musician/composer/writer and general empath it has seemed in my life that I have only to look at a girl to get her pregnant. This is an over-simplification, of course , but the consequences have been tragic and definitely left some scars. (You young-uns out there, always armed with a condom - Bless you, but that wasn’t my generation.)
I have wondered when couple friends of mine have had difficulty conceiving that their love-making might improve if the astral/emotional body were better charged. (Am I making any sense to anybody, or is this just going to be a total embarrassment? )
Bottom line, in the dreamscape mere closeness, a touch an embrace can make me go totally giddy because it’s the person-to-person exchange between opposite sexes and not the body (not saying her astral body isn’t sublime) that is gratifying, or as Leland says, ‘ecstatic’.
Ooooh. I’ll prob regret this one.
Matter is only mind in an opaque condition; and all beauty is but a symbol of spirit.
- E Hubbard
Bookmarks