Thankyou for posting this - i had no idea this was actually the going frank expert-opinon.Coming infact from those who forte it is to make it so.Originally Posted by CaterpillarWoman
For me personally i would much rather take into consideration what comes right from a intrapersonal liaison with a scientist and frankly such "inside information" is a luxury very few can brag much less expound.
You hear so frequently of this so called undergrad ,fly-by-night , run off the mill "published research" : "In a double-blind triple-trial placebo-placed 100 volunteer study we have postulated to produce result by showing that the String-Theory mainly posits that the electrons and quarks within an atom are infact not 0-dimensional objects as hoi polloi so assumes".
Like i said before opining either form/query/interjection or so called "bon mots" it generally fares well to be in clear stance of standing pertinent to given subject matter - if only to see how the discourse in question proceeds.Originally Posted by wstein
Agreed.Given the stellar caliber of intellect here at AD it is very much an upshot more possible than not - reality in abeyance ,ceramic , flux or otherwise.Originally Posted by CFTraveler
Bookmarks