@ Beek: One thing I didn't like about Danison's book (I'm not done with it, so I may be prematurely judging) is in her dualistic interpretation of what a human is.
But everything else sounds good to me.
@ Summerlander:
Fair enough.I merely state that for John Nash, it was better for him to regard his condition as unreal and troublesome. This is a fair statement given the fact that throughout his life, it was observable how his perspective and believe affected himself and his family. His initial regard for his hallucinations had no practicality in his life whatsoever and it was harming him and others.
Bookmarks