No, it was a mystical book, and the problem with it is that he was interpreting some stuff in a very irresponsible way- making things go together that really didn't go, saying for example that the root of a romantic word (with mystical significance) was the same as an english word when I happened to know it was not true, since I happen to speak both languages of which he was speaking about.
This type of thing kind of ruined the book for me, because it promised the discovery of ancient knowledge, when it was nothing of the sort- basing information on opinion and calling it fact.
Maybe he does better research now, because I've noticed that he has been gaining preponderance in the UFO and mystical communities, and it makes me wonder.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by CFTraveler
Bookmarks