He's a bit like David Wilcock (they even did a presentation together). Many criticise him and do not believe a word he says. The problem with these speakers is that they hardly give you any evidence of what they say. Not saying that all is wrong, how could I know what is wrong or what not? That is the problem. No evidence, just stories that could have a true core to them with lots of adornments for entertainment value added. Or not true at all.