The Red Beam and the Blue Ray?

[CFTraveler]

You guys crack me up... that's all I'm going to say.

[asalantu]

You guys crack me up... that's all I'm going to say.

¿Perhaps, because you knows all thing (material or conceptual) at this world is no more than an illusion; then, all ethical concern about fast enrichment is a nonsense..?

My best regards,
Ángel

[CFTraveler]

You guys crack me up... that's all I'm going to say.

¿Perhaps, because you knows all thing (material or conceptual) at this world is no more than an illusion; then, all ethical concern about fast enrichment is a nonsense..?

My best regards,
Ángel

Hola Ángel.
You asked me before why I found the convo so amusing, and I didn't answer because I couldn't put my finger on why exactly. It's not that there is anything wrong about being concerned about the ethics of getting something material from something apparently immaterial at all- we do it all the time and don't even think about it. Even though I am one of those people who believe that this material existence is but a speck in infinity; but at the same time also believe that life is precious and a gift and that we should do the most we are capable of doing to make it as best as possible for ourselves as for others- love, beauty, and all that.
It's just that I'm not that interested in the mechanics of whether I can manifest a dollar in my pants, whether it comes from the potential for the money to be there, or from someone else's quantum tunnel as the result of some sort of wormhole manifested by need or will. Just can't get into it.
Sorry if I offended anyone- my chuckle was almost involuntary, too bad it was noticed.

[JoSac]

Actually the trouser thing what by Robert Monroe in Far journeys, i just read that part. I found it ver interesting.

JS

[asalantu]

Sorry if I offended anyone- my chuckle was almost involuntary, too bad it was noticed.

Don't worry I was just kidding. Self enrichment doesn't plays a significant role for me. Was about manifesting phenomenon theoretical possibility that I was merged in this thread.

As a matter of fact applications of manifesting is of interest for me taking into account the problem of "how to avoid collision of an incoming asteroid/comet with our planet". ¿That is really doable..? Let's suppose an incoming object from centuries pointed to hit our planet, ¿it is possible to change its trayectory since someone of us be sure about we are safe..?

Sincerely,
Ángel

[Korpo]

Don't know. But given you can make errors in manifestation and involuntarily conjure up the opposite, better ban the thought completely...

Oliver

[CFTraveler]

Only if enough people concentrate on this outcome without fear, knowing it will miss. The problem is in the practical doability of this. Can you imagine everyone 'not fearing' a comet on it's way, sure of the outcome? I don't. I think the fear thoughts emanating from the people trying to do this (here comes the ol' subconscious) might undo what the focused 'intention' be trying to do. That's what's so tricky about manifestation.

Ok, now I'm leaving this thread for real.