PDA

View Full Version : "Kolbrin Bible": ¿A new hoax or answer to some askings?



asalantu
6th July 2010, 03:40 AM
¡Hi!
http://kolbrin.com/
Some paragraphs of this Bible remembers to mine sayings of Romanova russian scientist.
Spanish proficient members can match quotations from her at:
http://forosmp.com.ar/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=5506
Sincerely,
Ángel

CFTraveler
6th July 2010, 04:38 AM
It sounds to me that the Kolbrin bible is simply a putting together of many philosophies, some old and some new, and exploited to sell the 'doomsday' paradigm.
I did a little research and read parts of it, and it's fascinating, but IMO reads no different than any other mystery school, and reminds me of a certain school's teachings, which I'll keep to myself).
I excerpted a little from the declarations of the people that currently own the book (The Culdian Trust), for further thought:

"(it) is a collection of ancient manuscripts said to have been salvaged from the Glastonbury Abbey arson in 1184. The scrolls were transcribed on bronze tablets by the religious druids of the time.

The Culdian Trust believe that they are the inheritors of the ancient wisdom of the Culdees of Britain who were part of the British or Keltic Christian community prior to its romanisation under Augustine, after which it suffered severely through persecution and suppression.

The Culdian Celestial Age Trust do not refer to The Kolbrin as a "Bible" and do not agree that it is a version of the 'Old Testament'

(it) eventually became known as The Bronzebook of Britain, and the contents of additional salvaged manuscripts known as The Coelbook were later incorporated into it to form the modern version.

Around 1992, an elderly man from the Hope Trust who is now deceased put together the current draft from the originals.

The Culdian Trust members did not get to see the original manuscripts on which the most recent version of The Kolbrin was derived, nor do they understand how they came into the elderly man's possession or where he sent the originals upon completion.

-end of paraphrase.
To me this is the most important part- someone in 1992 writes it up and presents it as 'the work' yet the modern owners have not seen the originals!

http://www.thekolbrin.com/

If you'd like to read some excerpts:
http://www.thekolbrin.com/index.php?opt ... icle&id=45 (http://www.thekolbrin.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=45)

Are they still pushing the Planet X thing? Don't they know that it was 'predicted to come in 2002 and then 2003 or whereabouts, and it didn't come?