Multiple Reincarnations in Non-Linear Time

Answer:

Time and reincarnation are not simple matters.* Please read my online article, 'Reincarnation, Not So Simple', and this will give you some idea of its complexity.

Yes, I do think we incarnate into many lives simultaneously, including in the present.* Time is a manmade concept and the sense of time passing is a part of living in the physical universe. But in higher dimensional levels the sense of time passing can be hugely distorted, contracted or stretched. At very high levels, time ceases to have all meaning and seems to freeze.* This is called 'The Eternal Now'.* Imagine yourself reincarnating from the Eternal Now. If you can wrap your mind around the No Time concept, the answer becomes quite apparent, in that all incarnations occur simultaneous, past, present and future.

The common linear concept of reincarnation masks the mind-numbing complexities inherent to cogitating the No Time concept.* The popular linear view/dogma of reincarnation, life after life, is necessary for ordinary people to grasp the basic concept.* Linear reincarnation, life after life according to our physical time sense, is simply a rule-of-thumb way to diplomatically explain the concept of reincarnation.

And if you push the Eternal Now concept a little further, it becomes clear that there is only ONE source of consciousness. The physical universe is only a tiny part of the whole dimensional, spiritual structure that is the universe. The physical world and all life (nature) can aptly be called the physically manifested face of spirit. We all flow from a single source, from The ONE consciousness that is the whole dimensional and physical universe.* Therefore in a holistic spiritual sense we are most truly one another -- all spiritual brothers and sisters in the most profound way, including all other life forms, from dogs and bees and dolphins to ET's.* However, down here in the physical universe this concept is little realized, so the simpler rule-of-thumb concept of linear reincarnation is more popular.