Printable View
Well Oliver, I think that was the point originally, though I decided I am going to wait until these things happen before I get them tattooed on me. I just realized there were some important things I needed to buy for work so I did that instead.Quote:
Originally Posted by Korpo
Would you elaborate? Unless you don't want to.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil Templar
hmmm, tattoos are very personal, well for me they are. each of mine symbolise an aspect of self, or intent, or belief of sorts.
eg i have some Iban (Borneo tribal style) symbols, which represent a beginning of a new life, or cycle.
every time i see them i'm reminded of what that means to me, it helps remained focused on my intentions.
there's more but it's showtime and i gotta work... :D
Oh, ok. I get it. I thought you were talking about a specific method of doing something.
I think we strayed off topic.
I still haven't finished the first volume of the Flower of Life, I did go on and read the Kyballion. I needed a break, I started getting lost/having a hard time concentrating with the Flower of Life, too many equations. I am going to go back and finish the first part and then start reading the second part.
What are your thoughts about The Ancient Secret of the Flower of Life?
If you're asking me, I'm not done with it yet.
me too, finished part 1, started part 2, but like you say, it's a bit much for the brain at times, to just casually read thru.
i wish i'd caught the workshops, he was here in A'dam last year, i saw the poster advertising it, but was super busy at work.
i'll get back to it, but i've got much more "readable" stuff waiting to be read right now, so i don't know when that'll be...
On the whole, interesting and thought-provoking. There are some lovely concepts (some new, some recycled). Also, at times, it is a minefield of superstition and misinformation and some not-so-lovely concepts (again, some new, some recycled). Not something I'd recommend to someone who doesn't really like salt.Quote:
Originally Posted by Psychonaut1984
I didn't read it word-for-word in all of the technical sciencey parts because a) I didn't want to get hung up doing all the fact-checking that Melchizedek was too lazy to do himself (and basically says so in the intro); b) I know a lot of it is just plain wrong ("fluorine reacts with almost nothing. It's one of the most inert gases" *sigh* http://www.webelements.com/fluorine/) and I didn't want that to color my opinion of the more philosophical aspects of the book; c)If I want to read pure sciencey stuff I'll read Science the journal, or books like I'm already reading about patterns in nature (Structure in Nature as a Strategy for Design and On Growth and Form, in case anyone's interested).
Thanks for your feedback. I am too lazy to do the fact checking as well. Honestly I would rather skip the sciencey stuff all together. I haven't so far because he said it was part of training your belief system for the practical exercises that he hints at for the second volume. If I understood what half of it ment then I could see how my conscious mind would be processing it in sync with my subconscious. However some of it is so over my head and boring that I feel like its just being discarded completely. lol about the flourine. I wonder why he said that?Quote:
Originally Posted by VioletImagery
have any of you guys read The Serpent of Light in 2012?
his latest book. his story covering the past 25 yrs(IIRC).
it's basically his journey, being guided by his angels, to different locations across the globe and connecting with, and helping to connect the Earth with the indigenous peoples, in order to help the global consciousness grid come alive.
at times a little unbelievable, but who knows?
a very enjoyable read tho, and overall, the message is a good one.
and if everything he says in it is true, well... i'm glad he's out there..
i must say, having watched a few interviews with him online, i do feel he seems to be genuine enough... but again... who knows eh? :|