Plus mitochondrial DNA is not recombinant, so all females have approximately the same mitochondrial DNA of their earliest female ancestor, plus a few mutations.
Printable View
Plus mitochondrial DNA is not recombinant, so all females have approximately the same mitochondrial DNA of their earliest female ancestor, plus a few mutations.
h. wrote:I disagree. Just because someone else put the ability to think in us it doesn't mean that our thoughts are preconceived; it just means that the ability to think was engineered to be a certain way.Quote:
also, another disturbing fact kicks in here... if we were created and are observed by the higher beings, then all our possible thoughts and ideas must have been pre-programmed, or at least the program that would generate them must have been put there by someone else, who already thought of everything, so we are not "discovering" or "coming up" with anything, just trying to keep up with our creators...
It's like something out of a children's book that I really like:
(one dog telling another one about humans):
"Humans are complicated, Moxie. I told you they are a mystery. But here are a few things that I know. Humans are clever. They can see very well, and they can put things together to make new things. They change the world everywhere they go. This is why we dogs call them masters. But it is obvious that their smell sense is very weak, and the way they think and communicate is limited too- to barking, mainly. For example, sometimes humans think by barking out loud. But I was told that often humans think by barking in their minds. The inside of a human's mind must be a very noisy place."
"I like barking." Moxie said. (the puppy)"So do most dogs," said Sage. "But dogs are more complete animals than humans are. sure, we dogs can bark with our mouths, and we can growl. But we dont speak or think in just a mouth-way. we speak and think withou our bodies, with our eyes, and with our tails. but we mainly think and speak in smells.
-Excerpted from "The Boy who spoke Dog" by Clay Morgan.
I think our DNA is manifested in real time by our higher self awareness, it is part of the process of our base level awareness manifesting reality. What I mean to say is, that DNA if anything is inherent to the manifestation of living organic beings from pure awareness, that it is an elegant, real-time expression of both our current form and function, and also possibly of the higher knowledge/language/experience of our higher selves added in there to boot.
As we come closer to integrating our base consciousness with our higher selves, this dormant DNA may manifest in real time and become active. It would be the equivalent of evolution, but it happens as a chain reaction of awareness evolving, then DNA, then the biological representation of that awareness.
This could also explain how in evolution, there seems to be great gaps, instead of small linear changes or gradual progress, we may become enlightened to some degree, and manifest our DNA in real time to reflect this. This manifestation of more active DNA may be what activates our otherwise dormant psychic abilities.
This is just me rambling conjecture, I have not read the book, but I wouldn't be surprised if the book contains a similar theory. What I think makes my understanding unique or different from that in the book that's being quoted, is that I believe our physical, biological self is a real-time manifestation of our awareness. We exist as awareness, the fundamental energy, that can manifest matter, which we manifest into a real time representation of DNA, which in turn reflects our awareness in the form of a biological life form representation.
I am not so sure about DNA being the most efficient/compact molecule we manifest however, Mitochondria are incredibly efficient at producing energy (and might easily be considered life forms in of themselves ), and ribosomes are incredibly small efficient molecules that are responsible for taking RNA and producing more DNA. It's been some time since my biology courses, and I have yet to verify this cellular activity myself. I have read shamanistic ayahuasca trip reports of people taking the brew, and healing themselves by rearranging their own DNA. These reports further support our ability to manipulate our DNA in real time, even if sometimes at an unconscious level, and may explain the chain of how self healing works.. energy -> DNA -> biological healing.
*Is happy that it has found the time to catch up on this thread* :D
I find it very exciting, those frequently occurring numbers and constants, that do not only exist anywhere and everywhere, they may also be used to describe everything and anything. Even though I am a fan of words and a lover of languages, I have always felt that numbers, or Math actually, is the perfect tool for engineering, discovering and programming... When I have deep moments of insight, I actually feel like a computer program connecting to the matrix-like master program that is the Universe... No jokes! :)
CFT: That Dog story was so cute and still very insightful, I will totally read it to my future kids. Thank you.
True, but in that case it feels as if mankind is just a tool for another superior species, a lab rat if you'd like. But I try and see it in a more positive manner, what a great honor to gather information and help my Creator/s with coming to terms with, well, everything...Quote:
Originally Posted by CFTraveler
I have always seen the female sex as far superior to us guys, ok, the two sexes balance out each other in the end, but I still feel better when hanging out with ladies than with burping, smelling, sweaty "men". :D I wish the world was ruled by a Matriarch.Quote:
Originally Posted by Leyla
Nope I did not! Again I am not promoting illegal drugs, just pointing out that there are many sources that claim that prior to Siddharta having his Enlightenment, he lived solely on the cannabis plant, eating seeds etc. And we know what happened to him :) I think the trace of the stardust DNA can be found in every living organism in this world, everything that has a nerveous system generates Psi-energy = aura = accessible information. Could it be so that the creations use each other's different DNA and molecules in order to work together for a common goal?Quote:
Originally Posted by Beekeeper
Ruling out that "aliens" and "angels" and all those superior beings have had a very active role in the evolution of homo sapiens sapiens and her civilizations (which I believe they have), shouldn't everything be mapped out and included in the code? Adaptability, reactions based on signals such as different leaps in technology and other developement etc... Point being - if it's all planned out - what's the purpose of it all? Surely the wonderful people with this advanced technology, should have very high causes and goals. I feel that colonializing space seems like a very "simple" goal.
ps. I read a couple of years ago that scientists decided on a way to measure a civilizations developement, in the theroy they had somehow "calculated" how advanced the different alien civilizations out there in space should be, this ended up in a three level scale, 1, 2 and 3. According to the same group of scientists, our civilization hasn't even reached level 1... :) ds.
ps2. may be considered totally off-topic, but in a way not at all; Are there any other Battlestar Galactica fans out there? The whole philosophy between the Cylons created by humans, the 13 colonies (taurus, sagittarus etc... Earth) and all the other thoughts seem very non-fictional somehow, and a lot of thoughts and ideas that arose from watching the series, are very similar to those that came from reading this thread. Just checking. ds2.
About Francis Crick: (Hold on to your pantaloons, kids):
Look up Rosalind Franklin and see what it says about her (this is your homework). I will only quote I thing:
"the two men (Watson and Crick) visited Franklin's lab when she was out of town and persuaded to let her boss to let them take a peek at her data. ... They stole Franklin's findings and got away clean, tossing her a bone of achnowledgement in their seminal paper, which won them the biggest award in science. In his best selling book, Watson actually boasts about the theft, deriding their colleague for witholding her findings for publication in her own paper, which came out in the same journal-Nature-where theirs had appeared just a few months later. At the time, no reviewer... cried foul, although in later years some heroic attempts at correcting the record were made." How do you like them apples?
-Candace Pert, 1997- who had a hard time getting acknowledged for discovering endorphins, and was denied the Nobel prize for being a woman and/or PhD.
(My italics)
:cry:
Makes me think of the rumors that Einstein worked very hard to hide the fact that his wife helped him a lot with his work, also that T.A. Edison only got the patent for the light-bulb because he beat his female opponant to the patent-place. Or was it Bell with the Phone? Bleh 1am, where's the clarity?
I thought Edison beat Tesla to the patent? I thought it had to do with charisma in his case, if I remember correctly. I do know that when Mme. Curie discovered Radium, they wanted to give Henri the credit but he was bigger than the establishment, and she got the deserved credit.
Again, a couple of primitive primates walk up to something in the nature they see and go "hey, that's my tree, I discovered it, and it will bare my name for eternity", the other one goes "hey no way, I saw it first" and a dispute arises and they fight all day long, and the tree is just standing there, silent, eternal... 8)
anyhow back to topic... Beekeeper, I'm craving for more wisdom! :)
Sorry Hasalameth, I sat down to write it but somehow it didn't happen. Feeling a little down today. Having one of those existential crisises we all have every now and then. Find it hard to manifest anything much when I get this way. Usually bounce back quickly though :wink: