Brain is not storage site of memories
At marktime 9:34 of following video, youtuber José Luis Camacho, refers to discoveries of a french scientist who disregards brain as storage site of memories and for that reason (allegedly) recently awarded.
¿Do you knows name of such researcher? (Quote it at reply, please, ¡¡thank you!!)
Along commentaries section, at twelve opportunities J.L.C. is asked about, but no response at all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U41y...False#t=29.181
My best regards,
Ángel
Re: Brain is not storage site of memories
Hi -asalantu,
Without knowing but it ought to be true that the brain is not a storage site of memories, we live several life´s and on several parts of the world, and also in several levels of energy, when body
is deceased the memories of this person remains, not in the body but in the energy what will splinter into several levels of energy and keep the new knowledge from each life, so the soul will
be able to return home when it is whole and entirely learned to become ONE with eternity....or when the soul no more want to be separate/individual....I do not use God here because this term has got wrong inprint and used wrongly, so eternity can not be misunderstood in my world so to speak of course :-)
Love
ia
Re: Brain is not storage site of memories
There are many scientists of the "fringe" and open-minded ones who believe this or at least see this as a viable hypothesis. Of all kinds, biologists, physicists, medics, researchers of NDEs (often medical doctors), etc. They mention it here and there in their works (books or interviews) but I could not now name s.o. specific.
I believe it too.
The problem is that "meories" and the experience of them is treated by materialist science as sth local and within time-space. As if the patterns of firing neurons would constitute a memory itself instead of just the "triggering" of it.
Memories might be in 'non-local fields' outside of time-space, although this is also just a kind of metaphorical concept. The brain is maybe a tranducer of energy, information etc. and like a Random Access Computer that can help retrieve it for the incarnated being. As it is also with other processes of thinking imho. We here know also: Thoughts and thoughtforms 'manifest' in the astral, maybe they even exist and or are generated there.
Re: Brain is not storage site of memories
I'm Ok with all that.
My interest is to know who and how reach to such conclusion and to know arguments quoted at his research papers.
My best regards,
Ángel
Re: Brain is not storage site of memories
The only neuroscientist I found was Michael Egnor, who doesn't sound french to me. However, he is part of the creationist (aka 'intelligent design') movement, so I looked at his work, and it's mainly double talk, not science. I'll keep looking.
The only other thing I found was this- and it's not a french scientist, it's a french drugmaker.
http://www.medicaldaily.com/memory-l...ld-lead-315666
Re: Brain is not storage site of memories
Hi, great topic :-) very interesting. Anyway, sorry but I couldn't find his name. But I did find this article, which you might find interesting.
Re: Brain is not storage site of memories
Unfortunately, the publication beings with a big inaccuracy. Maybe ten years ago scientists didn't know of any part of the brain that was used to store memories, but nowadays that is not exactly true. It was true when Dr. Sheldrake published his book (which I have, BTW) but many discoveries have happened since.
Re: Brain is not storage site of memories
Re: Brain is not storage site of memories
And, you may have seen this one:
http://www.neuroscientistnews.com/re...iously-thought
As you can see, science as of now, pretty much is in accord with the message that Sheldrake originally wrote in his book- that they do not know of any place inside cells where memories are stored- but that instead, they believe (and have done extensive experimentation on this) that they are stored in the synapses- where cells connect with each other. This is more like an electronic 'airgap' storage, but needs the electrical activity of the cell signals to be able to be stored.
So it's not as 'mystical' as many 'spiritual' sites make it to be, because the activity is happening in the brain by brain cells. And there cannot be "one" place that they're stored, since memories are stored holographically (that much is known) throughout synapses in the brain.
I do agree that memories are probably encoded in some type of 'etheric matrix' that corresponds with, or is affected by the electrical activity that probably happens at the subatomic level-nonlocally- but that's just me guessing.
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Brain is not storage site of memories
Why would one associate the brain with memory? Rather, the brain would cognize having forgotten, Thusly there is remembering. You are the place...the totality of your happening within a collective. Re-Searching That? Good luck...the searchlight is always ON.
......SONG......
Attachment 1096
....Of Songs....