wow. thanks BW. i realize that you have an active operable understanding of Buddha [Understanding], because this is what He intended to impart. or to say, that when we learn how to properly suffer, the suffering is refined to where we may with comfort reside within much discomfort, perhaps not our own personal discomfort, but that which we observe and witness around within other's perceptive-disabilitys. "it" is much like the dial is just a hair off the desired station's signal with much static and less depth of clarity. the mind without clarity cannot but contrive or matrix [static noise] that which we imagine is the real depth into an artificiality of reality, perhaps even as a worship~abled idol. is this wrong? of course not. is it right? of course not. "it" just is 'as it is' until such time as "it" ain't enough.