why my UFO beliefs are changing.

[DarkChylde]

DC, I don't see why you think that interstellar travel is impossible. You say that space craft wouldn't be able to travel faster than the speed of light. But can you be absolutely sure? Years ago, some people said that the sound barrier couldn't be broken. But it was. Others said that the atom could never be "smashed". But it was.

Eintstein's theory is just that: a theory. Quantum physics shows, however, the entire unpredictability of the universe. Remember the famous "double slit experiment"? This is one of my favourite cartoons: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc Consciousness can, and does, affect how the physical world behaves. Dr Greer has often described how extra terrestrials travel using their minds to control their craft.

As for me, I have no difficulty accepting that space craft could travel faster than the speed of light. Some physicists have suggested that the inverse of Einstein's formula makes more sense: instead of mass increasing with speed, it would decrease. The trouble with Einstein's version is that theoretically, at the speed of light, an object would be as large as the whole of the universe. Have you read the work of the famous Russian scientist, Dr. Vladimir Ginzburg (see http://helicola.com/?p=about) ? The opposite is more logical - that at light speed, mass would become zero and become energy instead. Upon deceleration, the process would reverse, with the energy reverting to mass, gradually increasing to normal size as speed reduces. There is brief discussion here by David Willcock: http://www.divinecosmos.com/contact-...uantum-physics

I hope that this will help you. Every best wish to you, DC!

LPCF what a wonderful post , I really liked reading it (plus the links were excellent )

Let's just look what I spoke of in the first post ; the problem isn't that we can or cannot achieve faster or at the rate of light speed travel , the problem is that even if you achieve travel at/above speed of light the problem is the nearest star is millions and millions of light years away , (alpha centauri ?) , so for argument's sake let's assume faster than speed of light is already invented , does that mean we now spend millions of years travelling?.
If such a thing as light speed travel exists does that mean ET's travel hundreds if not millions of years to come to earth now THAT doesn't sound plausible , this is where all the other theories come into play for answers (warp drives , worm holes , bending space matrix etc etc).take your pick.

what is and is not possible with future technology? I'm honestly not sure how far I can bend the answer to that so it that justifies the ET/interstellar travel phenomenon.

[LPCF]

I'm glad that you liked the articles, DC!

Gibzburg's basic thesis is this: that at light speed, matter occupies zero space. That is the "tipping point", where matter converts to energy and it "flips" into a time-space universe (parallel but the inverse of our space-time universe). In that universe, distance has little meaning, as it is time which is travelled, not space. So by travelling in time in the parallel universe, unimaginable distances could be traversed in the equivalent of a few earth seconds. Then, by declerating back, atoms would "flip" back into the physical space-time universe we know (at the speed of light) and one could literally be millions of light years away in distance from the original departure point. This "tipping point" at the speed of light is a bit like the "sound barrier". Only instead of a simple "boom", much more radical changes happen.

You could call this process a "worm hole", "warp speed travel" or whatever - they are just words to describe a phenomenon which we do not yet fully understand. If we tried to explain to a caveman how a camera can take pictures of people, he wouldn't understand. In the same way, we do not understand fully about what happens at light speed, but one day maybe they will explain it in primary schools, LOL!

By the way, if this topic interests you, I strongly recommend "The Source Field" by David Willcock. His book covers lots of topics, but Ginzburg's work and those of other physicists in this area are discussed part of the way through.

[DarkChylde]

"The Source Field" by David Willcock - got it thanks.
'
I think the whole argument comes to rest at "future technology is very advanced and therefore we can't yet understand these things" , I concede to that , but I don't wholly buy into it (for reasons I've been explaining throughout this thread).

Let's see what technology comes to , in our life times at least , now that's something worth looking forward to.

[fghom001]

based on info who supposed be on their ships they got few means of travel 1 is mercury mixed with another metal and the other is machine that eliminates or removes the craft from th gravitational fields once object is not under gravity those feats of speed is possible.