What is the Universe made of? What is real?

[iknowhere]

What is the Universe made up of?
What is real?

'The Atomic Model' which theorises that we and the universe is made up of stuff has been proven false.
Even the theory itself recognises that a hydrogen atom is about 99.999999999999% empty space.

I suspect Albert Einstein (14 March 1879 – 18 April 1955) knew this when he said:
"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one."
“Imagination is more important than knowledge.
For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand,
while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.”

Ironically, Max Planck, (23 April 1858 – 4 October 1947) the Reluctant Father of Quantum Physics stated:
“There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force...
We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind.
This Mind is the matrix of all matter.”

Even the 'Hadronic Collider' failed to find a particle, despite its persuasive marketing and worship of the ideology.
The oxymoronic invention of 'dark matter' which cannot be observed nor measured, is a figment of Materialist Scientists' imagination,
including Quantum Physicists' (The science of of measuring stuff).
The naming of a theory is not evidence.

Fixing the constant value of the speed of light, and gravity does not make it true, but sure does lend much credibility to Quantum Physics.
‘Intellectual phase locking’ proves that so called science is dogmatic, and freedom of speech and expression is curtailed.
Reference to [Youtube] Rupert Sheldrake – The Science Delusion BANNED TED TALK.


What is the Universe composed of?

A simple model of an electric universe can be represented as perceived frequencies:


Consider this: The Holographic Youniverse MUST SEE!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YstFH3lb9LI



Our nerves is a carrier of electric signals.
Through our eyes and ears, our brains receive these input signals and decodes them.
Subsequently we perceive images, and sound, much like our computers decode internet wi-fi signals.
The human eye can only perceive the visible light spectrum.
Our ears can only perceive sound frequencies between 20 to 20,000 Hz.
The sensitivity of these sensory instruments diminish commensurately as we age.



Consider this 3D field representation at every scale, cell, the body, the Universe.
- a product of Mind magnetic field expressed by electric thinking:




Walter Russell, the author of 'The Secret of Light' and 'A New Concept of the Universe'
and
Ken Wheeler, the author of 'Uncovering The Missing Secrets of Magnetism'
may yield some answers.


Ultimately what is real?

Who is asking the question?
Who is perceiving?


---

[lord.of.the.now]

what i know is real about universe mirror reality could be quite real thoery

The good work on myself reflects in mirror reality

When i am ascending mirror reality is ascending

[CFTraveler]

I find the article to be misleading. The collider detected the Higgs boson, proving the existence of the Higgs field, which is what gives virtual particles its mass. You should read about Bohm's pilot wave theory. It has more evidence behind it, although it's not as 'mystical' as the more popular Copenhagen interpretation.

https://home.cern/topics/higgs-boson

[iknowhere]

Hi CFTraveler, nice to see you here.
(assuming you're from Astral Pulse)



Did you know that the life-time of a Higgs Boson is only a zeptosecond,
that is, one sextillionth (10 ^-21) of a second.


RSF Interviews Dr. Alexander Unzicker
In his book “Bankrupting Physics: How Today’s Top Scientists are Gambling Away Their Credibility”,
Unzicker criticizes modern physics theories, more particularly the Standard Model of particle physics and
string theory, as lacking experimental verifiability and arguing that they are no longer credible because
of their complexity. He along with his co-author call for a return to physics' experimental roots.

He is also the author of book: The Higgs Fake: How Particle Physicists Fooled the Nobel Committee

In Alexander Unzicker's blog, he writes:
What had been found by the researchers did not resolve a single one of the fundamental problems of physics,
yet it was immediately declared the discovery of the century. Whether this claim is fraudulent, charlatanry,
or just thoroughly foolish, we may leave aside; that the greatest physicists such as Einstein, Dirac
or Schrödinger would have considered the “discovery” of the Higgs particle ridiculous, is sure.
They would never have believed such a complicated model with dozens of unexplained parameters
to reflect anything fundamental. Though on July 4, 2012, the absurdity of high energy physics reached
its culmination, its follyhad begun much earlier.

[Youtube] On the Origin of the Constants c and h

~

From The American Journal of Modern Physics (201:
http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmp.s.2018070401.11.pdf
"Higgs mechanism view on mass has several drawbacks.
Furthermore Higgs boson is an artificially man made flux of energy with extremely small lifetime
and does represent a direct prove for the existence of Higgs field."

~

[Youtube] Higgs Boson Is FAKE Large Hadron Collider Is A Lie Evolution Is Nonsense

~

Consider this:
This man used the power of his hands to collide two iron pyrites/marcasite rocks together.
He produced sparks from this collision (without spending many billions of euros per year -cost of Large Hadron Collider).
Would one consider this spark, generation of a particle?
[Youtube] Primitive Fire From Stones

[iknowhere]

From The American Journal of Modern Physics (201
http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmp.s.2018070401.11.pdf
"Considering Big Bang Theory is not an adequate model of the universe, the Higgs field could not
appear in a certain time after Big Bang. This is another serious inconvenience of Higgs mechanism. "


I intended to add the above quoted passage from the article but could not see my previous post
because it awaits Moderator approval. Still can't see it as I write this post.
Please note, the premise of the ‘Big Bang Theory’ has not been called in for question; dogma.
Thus the basis on Quantum Theory is based on supposition, not evidence based.

Ironically Quantum Physics, Big Bang Theory, Super String Symmetry are not congruent with the Higgs Boson Theory.
Their magical maths and renormalization of constant values still can’t get ‘intellectual phase locking’ to work.
However if one dismisses all those inconvenient details, then the marketing, and wordship of Quantum Physics/materialism goes on.


Lets Sing [Tel Lie Vision Program Show]:



Our whole universe was in a hot dense state,
Then nearly fourteen billion years ago expansion started. Wait...
The Earth began to cool,
The autotrophs began to drool,
Neanderthals developed tools,
We built a wall (we built the pyramids),
Math, science, history, unraveling the mysteries,
That all started with the big bang!

tralalalalala .....