Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4
Results 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: Michael Evocation - SUCCESS

  1. #31
    frater_altpath Guest

    Re: Michael Evocation - SUCCESS

    LOL Star, that's all very true, I agree completely with your post.

    As for authors, I like Agrippa and anything old. Nothing new, since it's nothing new really. The old books explain it all, and the new authors just try to break it down in todays terms. Which ultimately ruins the original message.
    For example Tysons edition of the three books of occult philosophy actually distorts the old book. An easy example to look up, he quotes in his notes that spirits are the mediators between god and man, when in actuality the original quote is that daemons are the mediators. That's the first message he distorts, and throws off would-be researchers to believe spirits in general are good, but makes no mention of daemons.

  2. #32
    alwayson4 Guest

    Re: Michael Evocation - SUCCESS

    Now I am really confused.

    You say, you do not recommend Poke Runyan....but he is known for following all the old texts exactly.


    With the exception of his angelic correspondences and his use of the phoenician alphabet, he is the only author I know of, that follows the proper way of doing things.

  3. #33
    alwayson4 Guest

    Re: Michael Evocation - SUCCESS

    I reread your message.....


    I think I understand now. You reject ALL modern authors.

  4. #34
    frater_altpath Guest

    Re: Michael Evocation - SUCCESS

    Well, what exactly is the correct way of doing things? I don't believe that Poke's method of evocation is classical or traditional in any way. I've seen his rituals. Old style rituals don't even resemble modern understanding of what a ritual is. An old ritual can be to write some symbols on a leaf, chew it and then spit it onto the floor and wait for a manifestation. That's a weird example that I completely made up, but you get the idea. What I mean is, in the old days and old ways of thinking, it wasn't all drama and psycological to put one "in the mood" for magic, as Poke believes. It was actually believed that following this and that formula, you got the results you expected.

    I don't reject all modern authors, only the ones that either rehash what has already been said and done, the plagiarists, and the ones that go around saying their method is the method of doing it, and no other way will work. Some modern authors have written very good books though, and I enjoy those books.

Similar Threads

  1. Evocation By Physical Ritual Vs Astral Projection
    By journeyman in forum Mysticism
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 25th February 2015, 12:01 PM
  2. Ceremonial Evocation Magick as Exorcism
    By Yoda909 in forum Mysticism
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 28th October 2013, 04:59 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
01 TITLE
01 block content This site is under development!
02 Links block
02 block content

ad_bluebearhealing_astraldynamics 

ad_neuralambience_astraldynamics