An adept willing to investigate?

[sono]

I have been following the developments regarding the strange & very beautiful "drone" craft first reported by someone calling himself "Chad" on various sites. There is so much conflicting information from so many experts, that one is left no wiser as to whether it is all a hoax, or whether the reports and photos are genuine. Linda Moulton Howe has declared it a hoax, but two highly qualified scientists say the reports by "Isaac" concerning the alleged CARET programme, are in fact very possiblly true in light of present day advances in nanotechnology.

Would any of the adepts on this site be willing to look into the matter clairvoyantly or perhaps via the astral? Would such an undertaking be possible?

[CFTraveler]

sono wrote:

two highly qualified scientists say the reports by "Isaac" concerning the alleged CARET programme, are in fact very possiblly true in light of present day advances in nanotechnology.

This sounds like 'it could happen'.
I highly respect Linda Moulton Howe and find her to be a very level-headed researcher. However, could you give us a link to this information so we can make a better decision?

[Mishell]

Hey CF, here's the link http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/

[artdragondream]

Hi Sono

I'm a artist myself and I've looked into this drone thing. I looked into those documents as well showing the separate parts of what could have been the drone.

here is the link so you can look at it
http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1 ... nvironment

As an artist I've seen many things in the art world that tell me this is a skilled work of computer generated 3 dimensional ART. There are some extremely talented people out there that could make something like this very easily.

I've collected a number of images to show you what I mean. The first image has 2 things in common with the images in the first link. (Click on the images to enlarge them)

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/59671056/

First there seems to be a perfectly white background with a very hazy shadow underneath. A shadow like that is not natural and the reflections on the object seem to be showing that the only light source is coming from the surface it is placed on. You cant see any reflections of anything else in the room or even lights that should be above it.

Second the images have a grainy texture that is a characteristic filter for certain CG programs.

Here is an example of some 3D modeling similar to this so called "Probe"

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/56646657/

And here is an example of some of the genius that goes into some of this work. If it wasn't obvious that this ship is a creation of pure fiction you might think this was real with the amount of detail that has gone into it.

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/58212759/

It would be GREAT if this was some sort of proof for extraterrestrial technology but I'm convinced that this is a work of art put out there as a hoax and nothing more. And I'm fairly sure I've seen some of those symbols in a movie somewhere.

~Scott

[artdragondream]

Here are some more examples of the level of artistry out there. Each one of these are at the same level or higher of the supposed photos of the "Probe"


http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/59790316/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/58767570/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/57238829/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/56807472/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/54561305/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/48182332/

Technology in the field of digital art has gotten to the point where even the most outstanding imaginings can be created at a level where if you showed it to people nearly 100% of them would be convinced its real.

As an artist in this field i am able to see the tell tale signs that point to the "probe" photos being fake. I have no doubt what so ever.

~Scott

[Mishell]

Wow,
Those photos were scarily (? ) real looking.
I'm a photographer (and I like to make up words ), but I never got into digital art.
The pics were great. Thanks for sharing.

This whole CARET thing reminds me of the questions as to whether or not we really went to the moon.

[sono]

Thanks for all the links & responses, I have been watching the whole thing for weeks now & somehow hoped it was all real. . .apparently some Remote Viewers said they were sure it was a "real" object, but couldn't verify whether or not it was a hoax.
It's really sad that someone would go to so much trouble to set up a hoax; imagine if that time & energy were applied to a more important issue, the perpetrator (s) are obviously really well versed in their field!

Namaste all!

[wstein]

I would have to agree that the pictures have been digitally either altered or more likely created.

Note the peculilar angles of the light sources and reflections. Its somewhat hard to tell in the low resolution web photos but its too perfect. Even if an alien design is somehow perfect (sharp identical angles, not dirty, no wear and tear, etc), the photographing process is not.