Re: "Science and the Taboo of Psi" with Dean Radin
Well, I've long been of the opinion that ♥♥♥♥♥ only really wants kooks and charlatans. Someone like Radin, with years of data and research and experience designing tests is a little too reliable and/or legitimate for ♥♥♥♥♥'s taste.
You're right, Oliver. Radin and his associates around the world have decades of data, much of it peer-reviewed. There is definitely evidence that psi is real and not just wishful thinking on the part of researchers. Some of the techniques they use these days are very high tech and would be difficult to fudge (stuff like pupil dialation, brainwave patterns, etc.). The data is out there, published, peer-reviewed, and there's a lot of it.
The problem is that nobody is willing to take this data and work a theory with it. Even Radin says, basically, we don't know what's happening. Something is. It looks like mind-to-mind communication, but it could be something else. We have all this data, but no real theory that it fits in. We need theorists to take the data seriously and deal with it.
Unfortunately, the moment you start to consider these years of data valid, you break taboo...
May the light surround you, may you be blessed. May the light surround us, may we be blessed. May love and light surround us all, and may we all be healed and blessed. And so it is, and so it shall be, now and ever after.
Bookmarks