Ive just been reading a little on aura's and have become interested in the argument over whether we see an afterimage or aura around colours. Whats suprising to me is that the argument continues and yet it seems so simple to test.

Afterimage/aura information:
http://www.astraldynamics.com/tutori...BulletinID=249

I just read this:
http://www.astraldynamics.com/tutori...BulletinID=246

The brow centre receives a more subtle type of energy than light. This type of energy can only be received by the brow centre (often called the third eye or brow chakra) when it is active and tuned in to receive that type of energy.
an aura is definitely not any type of light.
If the third eye receives the energy we interperate as an aura and the energy isnt any type of light then it would only be natural that we wouldnt need a really bright room to see aura's?
Lets say you get an orange and a yellow coloured object and place them in a dimly lit room. Due to the lack of light the human eye wont be able to tell the colours apart, they'll both probably appear grey. Now if the aura argument is correct then it shouldnt matter that the human eye cant pick out the colour, because the third eye doesnt work on the colour as such (light), it just recieves energy from the object. If however you dont see the colours expected aura then its a good possibility that your seeing an afterimage and not an aura.

Anyone tried this?

>Roo