Quote Originally Posted by Antares View Post
I actually don't go the paradigm of "seeing more commons than differences" being a serious argument.
Not meant as an argument really. Just explaining my more positive approach and where I am coming from.

Moreover, seeing it it all negative and conspiracy-like is not an argument either but just a kind of 'mindset'.

Both mindsets are justified to some degree but that's why I think the best approach is somewhere in the middle.

Not believing everything we are told and apply open-minded scepticism towards both sides (the overtly good and the overtly bad stories / interpretations / opinions / beliefs) seems best to me - including gathering one's own experiences (via AP, hypnosis, whatever) but we should treat them the same critical way when we later analyse it and form our current beliefs around them.

After all we could speculate endlessly about this, so 'argueing' isn't really the case here because we cannot prove it one way or the other, honestly.