Oh, I saw it when it was on television. My impression was and still is that Richard Dawkins doesn't know anything at all about human nature, and his grasp of history and the humanities is questionable if he really sees religion as the cause of everything "bad" in the world. '

For someone who claims to treasure reason and value scientific method, he sure does go for the most simplistic possible answers (and in this show, he found the most lunatic fringe people he could find to interview, too).

To be fair, he didn't pick the title. That was pretty much forced on him by the production company, as I understand it. But I still find Richard Dawkins rather silly, and his conclusions are absurd.